Archive for March, 2007

Love letter

Wednesday, March 28th, 2007

D. H. Lawrence delights in a lizard being utterly itself, “The right toss of a chin for you, and swirl of a tail! If only men were as much men as lizards are lizards, they’d be worth looking at.” We are utterly ourselves in being happy. But, unlike lizards, our happiness is not in being self-contained. It is in stretching ourselves open to love others. We flourish in being turned outwards.

- Timothy Radcliffe, What Is The Point Of Being A Christian, p. 51.

IT’S such a gift to be in love, in love, in love with life. And I’m not writing this out of some manic or sappily sentimental phase, I’m just still very much in love with life itself. There’s so much to learn, new experiences, interesting people, shared smiles; I’m hardly ever bored, even during the ploddingness of it. It’s not true that it fades, things get more precious, not less.

“Are you content?” someone asked. No I’m often not, so many things are still question marks. But I’m very often joyful. It’s not just pleasure, it’s delight in word and world, it’s heart-felt laughter, it’s sly wit, it’s happiness that takes you out of the tight circle of your own concerns.

Cargoes

Tuesday, March 27th, 2007

“Nutmegs must be able to smell the sea, and cloves must see it.”

- Common saying in the Spice Islands, CHSEA, I.i, p. 209

Quinquireme of Nineveh from distant Ophir,
Rowing home to haven in sunny Palestine,
With a cargo of ivory,
And apes and peacocks,
Sandalwood, cedarwood, and sweet white wine.

Stately Spanish galleon coming from the Isthmus,
Dipping through the Tropics by the palm-green shores,
With a cargo of diamonds,
Emeralds, amethysts,
Topazes, and cinnamon, and gold moidores.

Dirty British coaster with a salt-caked smoke-stack,
Butting through the Channel in the mad March days,
With a cargo of Tyne coal,
Road-rails, pig-lead,
Firewood, iron-ware, and cheap tin trays

- Cargoes, by John Masefield

READING the economic history of the region, of rice-growing in the river basins and on volcanic soil, of the seas exposed to storm and piracy, spices and coconut and fish and rice, the routes by which Hinduism and Buddhism and then Islam and Christianity travelled to the countries here, the diversity of cultures and the jostling of powers, annexation of land and tribute states in continental S-E Asia. The language groups, the Mons and Khmers and Tais, Dai Viet, Champa, Oc-ceo, Majapahit. Scholarship and knowledge as goods to be carried and disseminated, centres of learning, crossroads of trades. The monsoons and the routes, Bay of Bengal, South China Sea, the ebb and flow of religions and kingdoms and history.

The stories of trade and the trading of stories, in temples and at court and in merchants’ marketplaces, around fires and inscribed upon walls, epics and fables and rich descriptions, moods and nostalgia and states of grace. The universal tales of love and loss, of ancient battles and never-forgotten rivalries, the making of heroes, the courting of queens, the burial of kings.

“No one, wise Kublai, knows better than you that the city must never be confused with the words that describe it. And yet between the one and the other there is a connection. If I describe to you Olivia, a city rich in products and in profits, I can indicated its prosperity only by speaking of filigree palaces with fringed cushions on the seats by the mullioned windows. Beyond the screen of a patio, spinning jets water a lawn where a white peacock spreads its tail.”

- Calvino, Invisible Cities, p. 61

Choices

Tuesday, March 27th, 2007

Flowers

Flowers, 2006

WHEN it comes down to it, whether it is the job you have or the person you love or the shoes that you wear, the first rule is you must be happy.

Someone told me “Life is not worth drinking bad wine.” True: Life is not worth eating bad food or having lunch with people you don’t want to be with or forcing yourself to trudge on down a path you do not want to be on. So take delight in your indulgences and don’t waste your time.

And Helen Keller once said: “Life is either a daring adventure, or it is nothing at all.”

But it doesn’t have to be all fireworks and spark. I’ve been happy burying my nose in books and doing nothing much lately, it feels good to have come to a decision to forget about the finance route, for now at least.

Six Weird Things About Me

Wednesday, March 21st, 2007

WAS tagged by Kristina to write about what makes me a weirdo:

1. I was a guy until the operation in 2001. You’ve always wondered why my voice was so deep, right? (Okay, so I lie. It’s a bad habit I’m trying to break.)

2. Food with eyes creep me out. That’s why I don’t eat ikan bilis and anchovies.

3. I come from a tropical country but I can bear the cold really well. I’d be walking around campus in thin coats during New England winters.

4. I can charm old folks and babies quite easily as I can be talky and bounce-y but also know when to shut up. Then I scare them when I show them that underneath my clothes I actually have a torso covered with green scales.

5. I used to be able to do splits when I was a child (all that training for Chinese Dance!) but I’m about as flexible as a tree trunk now. Can’t even touch my toes.

6. I have no allergies whatsoever, except I’ve the Asian Drinker’s Syndrome of turning bright red on just one glass of wine. But this isn’t really weird, is it?

Nutterguff

Monday, March 5th, 2007

I BELIEVE in scholarship that illuminates. And I think you can be a literary theorist and be informed about economics instead of spouting nutter-guff stuff. Well, I’m going to be. Was wading through Spivak as well as Negri/Hardt and wondering what on earth I was doing as an undergrad — a social conscience is one thing, but nutter-guff is nutter-guff. Feel like taking an axe to do some hacking demolition work. And if I’ve to teach nutter-guff I’d rather run off and be a dyed-in-the-wool capitalist while handing out macroeconomics and finance books to literature undergrads. Either that or make a switch to philosophy altogether, since I majored in that too.

Advice

Saturday, March 3rd, 2007

READING Cary Tennis columns, which the lovely J. in Beijing pointed me to, compulsively:

“Whenever we stand by unable to act, uncertain, holding out, waiting for something that may or may not occur, we are not living. We are not discovering life as it unfolds.

Life is messy and uncertain as it unfolds. There is only a very small area around our feet that we can keep orderly and sure. The rest is going to be messy. It is going to be messy and uncertain. But in that messiness and uncertainty there is also magic and grace.

That is the deal we make with life. We give up our fantasies of perfection in return for a chance at actual magic and grace. You cannot find that magic and grace by observing, holding yourself at a distance, waiting. You cannot find it by waiting because it is not something that happens to you; it is something you create. You create it by wrestling with life.”

*

“There are many ways to describe a self: As a set of memories, for instance. You are the storehouse of all that has occurred; you are the repository of and expert on all events occurring to you, a curator of memories, a collector.

Then there are your talents and abilities, the things you do with particular relish or style. Most interesting to me, though, is your collection of incidents of maximum impact, moments of insight, life-changing events: Two roads diverged in a yellow wood, the thing that has made all the difference. Some of these things involve unknowing knowledge, unsayable understandings. Certain things work for us: certain painters, certain tunes. That we can know dependably what works for us is also a measure of self.

Consider what others see when they see us: A kaleidoscopic procession of tiny performances. We are a canvas, too, a movie screen upon which others shine their light and, recognizing themselves or thinking they recognize themselves, love their own images seen on our blankness — on what we feel to be our lack of existence and which may really be our lack of existence!

What else do others see in us? If we have ever been kind, or laughed at a joke, or smiled a certain way or paid a compliment, or looked into another’s eyes with piercing intensity, then we have given something. As a consequence, people may feel that we are generous and kind. What we have given them may have been done in secret, unbeknown even to ourselves: We cannot always know what we are giving people; they get things from us we don’t understand. We help people without knowing it. We may have simply responded naturally, but it is taken as a gift, an act of kindness.

Also: We magnify others with our attentions. Have you ever been with someone whose interest in you seems inexhaustible, who can drink up as much of your blather as you can dish out, who never tires of your shovelfuls? Your shoulders tire of the shoveling and your eyelids grow heavy but … she glistens, mesmerized; you are unable to bore her no matter how dull you feel your words to be: You are the only person in the room and are thus magnified and so feel royal royal royal.

That is how it is with some people who don’t necessarily know us but have felt our effect and thus feel they know us, even if we feel that we do not know ourselves.

What do they know really? They know our kaleidoscopic sequence of tiny performances. They are familiar with our work. They know what we show them.

So there are many things that might constitute a self. But the interesting and somewhat contrary view is that the self is bondage, that our happiness can be attained only through losing self — by merging or acquiescing in something higher beyond us. ”

*

“These things happen and they take a long time to get over but always in the losing there is something to celebrate and remember: The priceless thing itself. It was there once. It really was there. It was not an illusion. It was not just a dream of something; it was the actual thing, the miracle, the love, the astounding knowledge of another’s heart.”

*

“I think a reasonable person would reach the conclusion that this is a married woman. You say so yourself. She’s separated but not divorced.

And then the reasonable person would say, Stay away from married women. They are not available.

They sometimes seem available. Sometimes they go out and get drunk and act as if they’re available. Sometimes they go live somewhere else for a while and that makes them seem as if they’re available. They even go out with other men. But they are not available. They are especially not available to you, especially in the way you want them to be available.

Had you been more aggressive and told her that you wanted to take her out with the explicit intention of starting an intimate relationship, you might now be in an intimate relationship with a married woman. That is not a good situation.

…Be glad you’re not involved with somebody who’s already involved. If you can’t get involved with people who are already involved without getting involved, don’t get involved. That’s my advice.”

Nutter

Friday, March 2nd, 2007

maths expansion

This made me laugh

*
AS DID this:

These are from a book called Disorder in the American Courts, and are things people actually said in court, word for word, taken down and now published by court reporters who had the torment of staying calm while these exchanges were actually taking place.

ATTORNEY: Are you sexually active?
WITNESS: No, I just lie there.
________________________________
ATTORNEY: What is your date of birth?
WITNESS: July 18th.
ATTORNEY: What year?
WITNESS: Every year.
_____________________________________
ATTORNEY: What gear were you in at the moment of the impact?
WITNESS: Gucci sweats and Reeboks.
______________________________________
ATTORNEY: This myasthenia gravis, does it affect your memory at all?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: And in what ways does it affect your memory?
WITNESS: I forget.
ATTORNEY: You forget? Can you give us an example of something you forgot?
_____________________________________
ATTORNEY: How old is your son, the one living with you?
WITNESS: Thirty-eight or thirty-five, I can’t remember which.
ATTORNEY: How long has he lived with you?
WITNESS: Forty-five years.
_____________________________________
ATTORNEY: What was the first thing your husband said to you that morning?
WITNESS: He said, “Where am I, Cathy?”
ATTORNEY: And why did that upset you?
WITNESS: My name is Susan.
______________________________________
ATTORNEY: Do you know if your daughter has ever been involved in voodoo?
WITNESS: We both do.
ATTORNEY: Voodoo?
WITNESS: We do.
ATTORNEY: You do?
WITNESS: Yes, voodoo.
______________________________________
ATTORNEY: Now doctor, isn’t it true that when a person dies in his sleep, he doesn’t know about it until the next morning?
WITNESS: Did you actually pass the bar exam?
____________________________________
ATTORNEY: The youngest son, the twenty-year-old, how old is he?
WITNESS: Uh, he’s twenty-one.
________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Were you present when your picture was taken?
WITNESS: Would you repeat the question?
______________________________________
ATTORNEY: So the date of conception (of the baby) was August 8th?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: And what were you doing at that time?
WITNESS: Uh….
______________________________________
ATTORNEY: She had three children, right?
WITNESS: Yes.
ATTORNEY: How many were boys?
WITNESS: None.
ATTORNEY: Were there any girls?
______________________________________
ATTORNEY: How was your first marriage terminated?
WITNESS: By death.
ATTORNEY: And by whose death was it terminated?
______________________________________
ATTORNEY: Can you describe the individual?
WITNESS: He was about medium height and had a beard.
ATTORNEY: Was this a male or a female?
______________________________________
ATTORNEY: Is your appearance here this morning pursuant to a deposition notice which I sent to your attorney?
WITNESS: No, this is how I dress when I go to work.

______________________________________
ATTORNEY: Doctor, how many of your autopsies have you performed on dead people?
WITNESS: All my autopsies are performed on dead people.
______________________________________
ATTORNEY: ALL your responses MUST be oral, OK? What school did you go to?
WITNESS: Oral.
______________________________________
ATTORNEY: Do you recall the time that you examined the body?
WITNESS: The autopsy started around 8:30 p.m.
ATTORNEY: And Mr. Denton was dead at the time?
WITNESS: No, he was sitting on the table wondering why I was doing an autopsy on him!
____________________________________________
ATTORNEY: Are you qualified to give a urine sample?
WITNESS: Huh?
____________________________________________

And the best for last

ATTORNEY: Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: Did you check for blood pressure?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: Did you check for breathing?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?
WITNESS: No.
ATTORNEY: How can you be so sure, Doctor?
WITNESS: Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.
ATTORNEY: But could the patient have still been alive, nevertheless?
WITNESS: Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law.