Archive for January, 2009

Riverside, waterfront

Saturday, January 31st, 2009

FROM talking of the movie Elegy we moved into speaking of inappropriate student/teacher relationships, age-gap dating, incest. I ended up listening to the synopsis of this most disturbing episode of X-Files, which Jo dug up and sent to me, and I now have to erase it from my memory.

Anyway, beautiful beautiful all-cello lunch-time concert by the local conservatory at the Asian Civilisations Museum. LOVED the Piazzolla, there were some cool arrangements for the cellos, and the new pieces for me by Elena Kats-Chernin and Simon Parkin were very fun as well.

Then we’d a good chat after work at this new bar on the waterfront, talking of the shipping industry, freight forwarding, our best bosses, company culture, travelling in Laos and Luang Prabang, beggars, the club scene, listening to stories of dating outside one’s culture, post-break-up activities, eating crisps from the trash bin, crazy college antics, listening skills, judging character, the consequences of giving a guy the ultimatum: “Your friends or me”.

The part of Singapore by the river and on the waterfront, around the Fullerton, is really very charming.

*

A: “Kandahar Street, in Arab Little.”
B: “….It’s Arab Street.”

Bright smiles all around

Tuesday, January 27th, 2009

umbrellas

Photo: ?? She looks kinda gloomy, though

FOR Chinese New Year; it’s been good to meet the relatives and get stuffed. Everything has been incredibly yummy, and I’m very very happy. I *LOVE* my relatives’ traditional Hakka dishes of abacus beads, kiu nyuk, trotters in dark sauce and vinegar, sea cucumber, fried tofu, etc. And my Teochew aunt makes a mean curry and ngoh hiang, and oooh the steamed prawns and homemade yusheng and baked goodies. And the families are such an interesting mix of working and middle class, with discussions ranging from tennis and property to driving taxis and 4D, with languages ranging from English to Mandarin to dialects.

Economically though, the year of the ox has opened with a bloodbath, what with Iceland and job cuts announced. Time to tighten the belt, and stick to my good old trusty budgeting skills. Who knows how long this downturn will last — it’s a great time to prepare for what comes after, though, jobs-wise, skills-wise, when it comes to investments and property etc.

*

To read: Marjorie Garber’s Shakespeare And Modern Culture. Review here.

Although I do not hope to turn again

Friday, January 23rd, 2009

A (on driving in a twisty estate): Although I do not hope to turn again,
Although I do not hope,
Although I do not hope to turn

A (upon being requested to do something): No.
B: Look at me. I’m cycling rapidly through the five stages of grief.

*

Photo: S. in Japan

Speaking of Eliot, we were talking of fire, liminality, and cremation at work. My boss visited Little Gidding last year in May: “the place is exactly as he describes it. the hedge is really there. and you do get to a pond when you walk round the hedge. and the pig-sty is there still too — only there are no pigs now.”

“i know the quartets well too…and have visited all the places except burnt norton. many years ago, my wife and i went to east coker. the lanes did “insist” –and they were “dark in the afternoon”. only, every damn lane in the area is dark in the afternoon, so you can’t tell which is the lane he referred to. we stayed overnight. the people in the village asked us why we were there. we said a great poet is buried in st michael’s church there. the villagers didn’t know. dry salvages — got a fisherman in gloucester to take me round it. those rocks too are exactly as he described them. the little gidding farmhouse — the nicholas ferrar place — is now a retreat. a lovely couple run it. you can go stay there. you can google them and make a booking.” Also talking of Eliot’s lyricism, and poets who read their works aloud: “i don’t think eliot was a particularly good reader of his own poems. there is his reading of sweeney agonistes — that’s very good. the other poems, i though he flattened out things. Alec Guinness has recordings of eliot’s poems — including quartets — and they are very good. very suble, really brings out the lyricism. and eliot is an incredibly lyrical poet. few poets are good readers of their own poems. yeats sounded like a town cryer. auden was boring. only dylan thomas — he was a real perfomer. only i hardly understood most of his poems.” I love the BBC poets aloud archive, and the Academy of American Poets listening booth offers many original readings. Poetry archive, too. How I love the spoken word.

Gorgeous fashion editorial

Friday, January 23rd, 2009

No idea which magazine they come from, but I saw these photos at this site which I visit once in a while. Xiaoyi Dai looks spectacular, and the shoot is very well-styled.

Ding dong, the witch is dead!

Tuesday, January 20th, 2009

Wake up — sleepy head, rub your eyes, get out of bed.

*

As the BBC puts it, the former Governor of New York, Mario Cuomo, once said: “You campaign in poetry. You govern in prose”. Inauguration Day marks the intersection of the poetic and prosaic.

*

- draft, 500 words
- Norton anthologies, notes, subject GREs
- Project Read Everything Of Graham Greene’s
- French: reading proficiency. Back to reading books with dictionary in hand.
- hobbies that need practising, movement, trying out new activities
- keeping up with current affairs
- social life, letters and e-mails and postcards
- budgeting and saving, spreadsheets, personal finance stuff
- planning travels, balancing with work plans and friends’ schedules
- commutes: reading/BBC podcasts
- movies! Project Watch Kazan & Almodovar etc etc. Am no longer in manic state, but so many things on the “To Watch” list

East Of Eden: read it.

Tuesday, January 20th, 2009

“If a story is not about the hearer he will not listen. And I here make a rule — a great and lasting story is about everyone or it will not last. The strange and foreign is not interesting — only the deeply personal and familiar.”

On Una: “She seemed always to be listening. When she was reading, her face would be like the face of one listening to music.”

“And then Dessie fell in love. I do not know any details of her love affair — who the man was or what the circumstances, whether it was religion or a living wife, a disease or a selfishness…All I do know is that it was a hopeless thing, gray and terrible. After a year of it the joy was all drained out of Dessie and the laughter ceased.”

“I think this is the best-known story in the world because it is everybody’s story. I think it is the symbol story of the human soul. I’m feeling my way now — don’t jump on me if I’m not clear. The greatest terror a child can have is that he is not loved, and rejection is the hell he fears. I think everyone in the world to a large or small extent has felt rejection. And with rejection comes anger, and with anger some kind of crime in revenge for the rejection, and with the crime guilt — and there is the story of mankind. I think that if rejection could be amputated, the human would not be what he is. Maybe there would be fewer crazy people. I am sure in myself there would not be many jails. It is all there — the start, the beginning. One child, refused the love he craves, kicks the cat and hides his secret guilt; and another steals so that money will make him loved; and a third conquers the world — and always the guilt and revenge and more guilt. The human is the only guilty animal. Now wait! Therefore I think this old and terrible story is imoprtant because it is a chart of the soul — the secret, rejected, guilty soul.”

“The King James version says this — it is when Jehovah has asked Cain why he is angry. Jehovah says, “If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him.’ It was the ‘thou shalt’ that struck me, because it was a promise that Cain would conquer sin…Then I get a copy of the American Standard Bible. It was very new then. And it was different in this passage. It says, ‘Do thou rule over them.’ Now this is very different. This is not a promise, it is an order…And this was the gold from our mining: ‘Thou mayest.’ ‘Thou mayest rule over sin.’…The American Standard translation orders men to triumph over sin, and you can call sin ignorance. The King James translation makes a promise in ‘Thou shalt,’ meaning that men will surely triumph over sin, meaning that men will surely triumph over sin. But the Hebrew word, the word timshel — ‘Thou mayest’ — that gives a choice. It might be the most important word in the world. That says the way is open. That throws it right back on a man. For if ‘Thou mayest’ — it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.’…It cuts the feet from under weakness and cowardliness and laziness.”

“I remember he said one time that a woman who knows all about men usually knows one part very well and can’t conceive the other parts, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t there.”

“He said, ‘There’s more beauty in the truth even if it is dreadful beauty. The storytellers at the city gate twist life so that it looks sweet to the lazy and the stupid and the weak, and this only strengthens their infirmities and teaches nothing, cures nothing, nor does it let the heart soar.’ ”

With Lee, Cal’s tricks did not work, for Lee’s bland mind moved effortlessly ahead of him and was always there waiting, understanding, and at the last moment cautioning quietly, “Don’t do it.”

Adam’s recognition brought a ferment of happiness to Cal. He walked on the balls of his feet. He smiled more often than he frowned, and the secret darkness was seldom on him.
Lee, recognisinig the change in him, asked quietly, “You haven’t found a girl, have you?”
“Girl? No. Who wants a girl?”
“Everybody,” said Lee.

There was the flashing Samuel, beautiful as dawn with a fancy like a swallow’s flight, and the brilliant, brooding Tom who was dark fire, Una who rode the storms, and lovely Mollie, Dessie of laughter, George handsome and with a sweetness that filled a room like the perfume of flowers, and there was Joe, the youngest, the beloved. Each one without effort brought some gift into the family.
Nearly everyone has his box of secret pain, shared with no one. Will had concealed his well, laughed loud, exploited perverse virtues, and never let his jealousy go wandering. He thought of himself as slow, doltish, conservative, uninspired. No great dream lifted him high and no despair forced self-destruction. He was always on the edge, trying to hold on to the rim of the family with what gifts he had — care, and reason, application. He kept the books, hired the attorneys, called the undertaker, and eventually paid the bills. The others didn’t even know they needed him. He had the ability to get money and to keep it. He thought the Hamiltons despised him for his one ability. He had loved them doggedly, had always been at hand with his money to pull them out of their errors. He thought they were ashamed of him, and he fought bitterly for their recognition. All of this was in the frozen wind that blew through him.

“Go to bed now, and in the morning get up early and tell your father about the tests. Make it exciting. He’s lonelier than you re because he has no lovely future to dream about.”

“Laughter comes later, like wisdom teeth, and laughter at yourself comes last of all in a mad race with death, and sometimes it isn’t in time.”

“He asked me to go to the Alisal when the wild azaleas bloom.”

*

Found the library copy of East Of Eden and am devouring it — I like its description of sibling relations, of people who breathe and sin and choose, and Steinback writes with insight, compassion and grace. The mystery of identity; the inexplicability of love; the consequences of love’s absence. The best book I’ve read this year. Go read it.

*

:) It’s a daily feat, getting myself dressed and out of the house with all my effects and reach work safely. First I forgot the yoga mat, and had to head back upstairs from the bus-stop. Then I tripped over my yoga pants while running for the bus. And when I was on the train, I realised I’d forgotten to bring work clothes — ended up having to buy a skirt at This Fashion.

Dinner conversation of how MPs break the handshakes of people who won’t let go, the last kampung in Singapore, sumo wrestlers and retractable testicles, Olympics bribery and opening ceremonies, Bulgarian umbrella assassinations, how sex is used during election campaigning. It’s gonna be a busy week, what with the inauguration and Budget and such — fun talk with great colleagues over nice meals brings up the spirits.

A: So they had the crippled archer in Barcelona, and to top that they brought out the doddering (imitates doddering actions) Muhammad Ali in Atlanta.

*

To read: The Grapes Of Wrath

Quotes from Sherry

Sunday, January 18th, 2009

Graham Greene to Catherine Walston:

“Let’s go to a flicker & have supper at the Casanova — but mostly I want to lie beside you (& under you & over you) on this great barren bed.”

“Nine years are more packed with memory than the rest of life.”

“Nobody can mean as much to me as you in the head, the heart, the body — any way.”

“You — when we are together — give peace for work from worry, & so in a smaller way does Anita. Neither of you are emotional cocktails. Neither of you make demands.”

He came to the conclusion that one loves a city only because of associations or because “one is with someone one loves. I love you & long for Paris.”

“Now again I wish you were with me. I realise now — apart from making love & reading & bathing & going to movies — what a protection you are. Here I’m rapidly getting the reputation a) of being a homosexual b) impotent c) sick or d) a religious fanatic.”

“I always remember that never for a moment have I ever been bored by you — enraptured, excited, nervous, angry, tormented, but never bored, because I lost myself in searching for you.”

a “sea-deep, richly coloured, subtle yet complex love” for Catherine.

*

Man needs escape as he needs food and deep sleep.
- Auden

*

To try: Beng Hiang at Amoy St. Will organise an outing so we can go stuff our faces with kong bak bao.
To read: A Burnt-out Case

Kreisky etc

Saturday, January 17th, 2009

INTERESTING conversations about Bruno Kreisky and socialism, and Bush’s legacy and Reagonomics, the Special Branch in Malaysia, bodyguards and assaults on MPs (one who was hit on the head with a spanner five times, and STILL continued his meet-the-people session, and was then treated as an outpatient at a hospital! Not even an MC!), photography and light, our boxes of Mi Goreng in the dorms back in those days.

And also Citi. In 2000, Citi’s stock traded for about $60 a share. It will never get back there again. It may never get back to $10. Much of that drop is due to the market, furious at bad investment decisions that caused huge losses, which has diminished the value of bank stocks by over 80%. In any case, a new order is being put in place in the American banking industry.

The Economist has a great headline: “A house built on Sandy” — and the deck uses the following lines from the KJV: And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.

*

Just got off the phone: talking of facial muscles and “leak” of emotions, how researchers can tell if people would divorce, vacations and families, personal boundaries, business plans and e-commerce, Jeff Skoll, looking people in the eye and centres of consciousness separate from our own and as real, dignity and respect, trespass, when stories about others shouldn’t be used as entertainment, dealing with different people and situations, of being sure of who we were, where we’re coming from, what we want.

I love how plural my friends are, interested in different things, appreciative of beauty, of life. I know I drone on and on about how lucky I am to have such people in my life, but I am! :)

*

A (As Quelqu’un M’a Dit came on): Oh! I love her songs! Carla Bruni is very attractive. Gorgeous voice, former supermodel, married to Sarkozy, great sense of style. If you google her you can ogle her naked pictures.
B: Do I look like the kind of guy who looks at naked pictures online?

B (on skin-whitening products): So they realised that guys make up 30 per cent of those who buy “Fair & Lovely” — and they came up with “Fair & Handsome”. There’s this really funny ad of a guy who gets mocked as he tries to use Fair & Lovely, and then a bottle of Fair & Handsome descends from the heavens.

B: She realised she’d forgotten her purse, so she said to the locksmith: “Can I pay you in some other way?”

B: What is it about women and gay men? Why do you love gay men?
A: I love all men.

*

Listening to a couple of tracks from Memory Almost Full, I really really like them. Mr Bellamy, for instance, is very catchy. And the video for Ever Present Past makes me want to dance! Macca’s still pretty damn cool.

Light

Friday, January 16th, 2009

National Museum’s roof

Wong Kar Wai-ish

Cinnamon etc

Monday, January 12th, 2009

A: “Don’t die on me.”
B: “No, dying is when I stop breathing. Blowing my nose, I’m okay.”

B: “Yeah okay, he’s cute…in a certain “satanic-i-own-guns-and-machetes” kinda way.”

A: “B, you’re showing tact. Are you feeling okay?”
B: “Hey, I’m an Asian woman. I devote all my energies to cultivating tact, avoiding confrontation, showing thoughtfulness, diligence and frugality.

A: “All I ever wanted was my own way.”

B: “It’s a cinnamon for love.”
A: “What?”
B: “Synonym. I mean synonym.”

A: “Beware of marrying like Dorothea Brooke.”
B: “Really? I think I’m a mix between Casaubon and Rosamond Vincy. Unfinished projects, beautiful and vain.”

C: “You guys are out of control.”
B (pointing to A): “She’s easy to control. Just tighten her leash.”
A: “Woof!…Actually, I prefer gags.”

*

Discussions over the weekend: La Vie Boheme, Scandinavian men, Captain Hook and pirate fantasies, Boolean sexuality, when nausea is acceptable as a flirting technique, uses for basements, Catholic theology and Joyce, the meaning of “it’s complicated” in Facebook, plaid.

Rereading Middlemarch as a cautionary tale. I’ve only finished two books this year, the Norman Sherrys Vol I and II.

And rewatching the bomb bit in The End Of The Affair, which I can rewind and rewatch for a good number of times: Julianne Moore’s acting is exquisite. Listen to her voice when she says: “Love doesn’t end just because we don’t see each other…People go on loving God don’t they, all the time, without seeing him.” Look at those eyes. Heartbreaking.

So I’ve got dance lessons, and calligraphy, and golf, lined up. Together with other regular activities like drug smuggling and trading kidneys and yoga and swimming. Something’s got to go, I can’t cram all of this into my schedule and still manage to read and write and watch movies.

*

Revisiting my perfumes — I used to wear Lancome’s Oui in college, then Gucci Envy, then L’eau d’Issey for a few years now — may go back to wearing Envy again once in a while, I do love the sharpness it has, it’s a green, fresh, modern, abstract innovation.

Dating blah blah

Sunday, January 11th, 2009

IN 21 Things I Want In A Lover, Alanis asks: “Do you derive joy when someone else succeeds? Do you not play dirty when engaged in competition?” I think nothing is more intellectually attractive than someone who is constructive, whose every choice benefits not just himself, but others as well. We were talking of dating over dinner tonight — I think it’s good to raise your understanding of instinct and character to the highest level possible and choose well before you even begin to think of getting serious.

When you stay true to yourself and to others about exactly who you are, what you need, and therefore what you must seek out of life, and the other person is candid and frank too, it makes things much easier too. And I’ve learnt so much from dating, things about personal boundaries, for instance, not to suffer much over things I cannot control (such as how the other person reacts) — don’t waste emotional energy on the uncontrollable things in life. We never have control over other people — you do control what’s inside your boundary, though: likes, dislikes, attitude, standards. So you work with whatever you can work with to solve problems, accept your own limitations and the limitations of others around you. Have a cool eye looking over the situation, looking over yourself, over the other person, as objectively as possible. Something not quite right? You calibrate the next time. It’s an interesting process. Enjoy moments of laughter, of surprise.

*

Still reading Sherry:

The part about falling in love while eating onions, the writing of The Power And The Glory. The war and MI6 stories. Approaching the Catherine Walston segment!

*

To watch: De battre mon coeur s’est arrt

Rawls

Friday, January 9th, 2009

DISTRIBUTIVE justice/desert and entitlement: fascinating stuff! Rawls’ maximin theorising for his second principle may require too much, and would fail to compel allegiance. It also seems to ignore a central demand of justice, that merit or desert should be rewarded. On desert: the distinction between inequalities brought about by choices and circumstances is very difficult to maintain. And Nozick argues that if people exert their labour in the production process, then the maximin process is unjust, with Rawls treating the better-off as means to ends of other people.

There is one answer to this: The more well-off, if they take themselves in some strong sense to be implicated in the fate of their less favoured brethren, would not be inclined to see themselves as exploited. The needs of citizens, not of individual persons, dictate the guaranteed social minimum.

But you can say that in justice as fairness, the balance between justice and democratic politics tilts in favour of absract analysis and Rawls’ views verge on utopia. Philosophical and political concepts have not much in common and many of the versions of political philosophy today display a flight from the political, the shrinking of the political into an area of constructed consensus guided by a vision of the good life.

OP arguments may sustain reasonable hopes not of unanimous agreement, but of creating the conditions for a community of justification. Considered convictions as citizens of a modern constitutional democracy are strengthened and clarified, whereby some illusions are defeated and some myths (such as meritocracy) challenged, whereby certain prima facie attractive options (eg average utility) are dismissed and we discover resources to fight for what is non-negotiable, namely the equal basic rights and freedoms, fair equality of opportunity, the social conditions for self-respect and human dignity, and for a full exercise of citizenship.

What’s possibly the richest legacy of Rawls is an understanding of citizenship that goes beyond traditional liberalism and possibly points towards a “strong” or republican conception. Traditionally, republicanism is characterised by an understanding of citizenship based on an agreement on a shared conception of the good and on the priority of public virtues over private interests. The first aspect would make it unacceptable for Rawls’ political liberalism. But he shares with republicanism a major concern with stability and social cohesion, and he recognises that the latter is more effective than liberalism in creating the kind of stability and cohesion that modern democracies require. In contrast, liberalism’s emphasis on individual rights impoverishes the meaning of citizenship as it creates a culture of grievances, demands and claims, not of solidarity and reciprocity. It is not concerned with the bonds of citizenship, but with the needs of individuals. The societal aspect of citizenship is played down. It is clear that Rawls does not remain as indifferent as most liberals to the question of the fair value of political liberties. It is the erosion of these very liberties in a “market democracy” that started his enquiry into political and social justice in the first place. He shows great concern for what we could call the “privatisation of politics” or the politics of lobbies and private interests, and he calls for a renewal of citizens’ participation as an answer. In “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited”, he gives his most explicit statement of how he understands citizenship, a statement that sounds fairly republican in view of its emphasis on citizens’ responsibilities and on public reason:

Ideally, citizens are to think of themselves as if they were legislators and ask themselves what statutes, supported by what reasons satisfying the criterion of reciprocity, they would think it most reasonable to enact. When firm and widespread, the disposition of citizens to view themselves as ideal legislators, and to repudiate government officials and candidates for public office who violate public reason, is one of the political and social roots of democracy, and is vital for its enduring strength and vigour

(IPRR: 136)

Obviously, empowering citizens and treating them as responsible for the justice of their institutions and for putting forward social and political criticism is an important part of Rawls’ project. Let’s quote Rawls’ own description of republicanism:

Classical republicanism I take to be the view that if the citizens of a democratic society are to preserve their basic rights and liberties, including the civil liberties which secure the freedoms of private life, they must also have to a sufficient degree the “political virtues” (as I have called them) and be willing ot take part in public life. The idea is that without a widespread participation in democratic politics by a vigorous and informed citizen body, and certainly with a general retreat in private life, even the most well-designed political institutions will fall into the hands of those who seek to dominate and impose their will through the state apparatus…The safety of democratic liberties require the active participation of citizens who possess the political virtues needed to maintain a constitutional regime.

(PL: 205)

The central tenets of republicanism, which Rawls shares, can be summarised as: civil liberty needs political rights and participation; liberty is always at the mercy of domination; and citizens’ engagement and participation are the conditions for stability. The whole idea of justification as an ongoing effort that involves public reason is fairly characteristic of republican politics. What is distinctive in Rawls’ theory are the two ideas of the OP and of placing intuitions and principles in reflective equilibrium, for which there are no obvious republican equivalents. Giving the fair value of political liberties a special priority was also a meaningful innovation in the principles of justice as fairness.

While in classical liberalism, civil rights have priority over political rights, which are instrumental to the protection of personal autonomy, for Rawls, they are constitutive of it. He adds a sense of political responsibility to the list of liberal rights that define citizenship and he tries to reconcile the “liberties of the Ancients” (political participation) with the “liberty of the Moderns” (personal autonomy and non-interference). Freedom for Rawls is not simply freedom from interference, as this may still leave you at the mercy of a benevolent but all powerful ruler. Equality matters, and emphasising the link between individual freedom and an equal structure of power is characteristic of Rawls’ theory. This is why the liberties of both public and private autonomy are given side by side and unranked in the first principle of justice. The list of basic liberties does not privilege the liberal liberties over the republican ones, but gives them the same weight.

Rawls hence unites the two types of rights that make up citizenship. The first corresponds to the “liberty of the Moderns” and the rational concern for one’s own good, the second to the political liberties of the Ancients and the concern for justice and the common good. Here we hve the first elements of a new conception of citizenship which is neither liberal nor republican.

For him, the value of political liberties does not mean that the “personal is political” in the way it is for republicans. The civil and the political spheres are distinct: the realm of non-public concerns and associations is specific and distinct from the political forum.

Fragmentation, conflicts and divisions are at the heart of democratic individuality. The political conception of the person both acknowledges these conflicts and exacerbates them. Political rights are not simply external to and instrumental in the development of personal ends and commitments — they play a constitutive role. Rawls’ idea of citizenship describes a moral individuality divided, on the one hand, between valuable inherited historical and personal commitments and on the other the power that modern political rights have yielded to critically distance onself and even to rebel against those very crucial commitments. Either emancipation from or acceptance of traditions increasingly becomes a matter of personal responsibility.

These internal conflicts and divisions lead citizens to “think” in a way that traditional communitarian contexts do not favour, and to advance public justifications and reasons for their preferences, as these are not obvious for the rest of society. This is why Rawls’ central concern is rightly with public justification and citizenship, since these internal conflicts and validation processes they call for are precisely the reason why citizens have to “think” reflectively and to search for public justification. There is an organic link between the emergence of political rights and the split nature of the democratic self. Political rights may both create and heal these divisions. It is hence wrong to look at the self of political liberalism as possessing a unity independently of public commitments and citizenship. It is wrong to see it as uncommitted and available for anything or as indifferent and amoral. Rawls has tried first to reconcile liberalism with the demands of justice, beyond the narrow confines of rights-based demands, and then to reconcile civil with political liberties in a conception of citizenship. This is an extremely important move that has brought him closer to a form of liberal republicanism and to a richer conception of the political self, which both reflect his central commitment to autonomy and equal respect for persons.

*

Also, how does commitment to some “Rawlsian” conception of justice translate into everyday ethics? Does it make ethical sense to advocate maximin instutitions while recoiling from maximin conduct?

*

Down with a cold and am on four different kinds of medication that knocked me out for the day. Good to take a rest.

I’d forgotten

Thursday, January 8th, 2009

HOW much I love the bloodsport of chess until a new friend was talking about litigation. Reminded me of how Bobby Fischer operated, as this BBC report reads:

“Fischer had a gladiatorial view of chess. “I like the moment when I break a man’s ego,” he once said in an interview, adding to the sense of theatre surrounding him that helped elevate the game from an obscure pastime to worldwide front-page news.

“He did enjoy humiliating his opponents. He could sense when his opponent was crumbling before him,” says David Edmonds.

“But his style of playing was never flashy for the sake of showing off - it was clean, logical, ruthless and efficient. There was nothing ornamental about it,” he says.

Despite the scale of his downfall, Fischer continued to inspire successive generations of chess players.

*

A: I want to watch Elegy
B: Allergy? Do they sneeze a lot?

A: It’s about an old man who falls in love with a young woman. It’s the same plot. It’s very tiring.
B: For the old man? Or the young woman?
A: For the reader!

A: So he said he will not be responsible for any tragedy that happens out of this.
B (pointing to the baby): That is the tragedy?
Baby coos.
C: Tragedy raises her voice.
Baby hits the table.
A: Tragedy bangs its fist upon the table.

A: I hate the sinner but I love the sin.

*

The French film Lady Chatterley is so Rousseau it made me want to puke a little into my handbag. Am listening to bouts of Bach to cleanse my system now. I liked the greenery and the sound, though.

Interesting day out, including much laughter at Cedele with YL and SY together with baby S — talking of tragedies and golden showers etc — then I was rude to V who was kind enough to engage in a 20-minute “Amazing Race coffeehouse edition” in the middle of his work day — ended up ranting over Rawls and politics and being generally exhausting.

*

Should really focus my scattered energies on stuff that matters: I’m prone to becoming over-enthused about everything and end up being a Jack of all trades, master of none. It’s been fun being the social butterfly lately, but time to get some work done.

A good start

Sunday, January 4th, 2009

NYE 2008/09

FIRST post of the year! Love my friends so much, we’d partied hard and talked burblingly and made funny toasts and shared bad gifts. And I adore it when my friends all interact with one another and hit it off! 2008 was good when measured in love, and 2009 has been fabulous so far. Happy happy new year, everyone!

Life’s been so full lately, what with reading and writing, moving around and twisting about and reviving my French and German, which I’ve not used for so long. A good mixture of being thinky, dance-y, hungry, flirty, tinkly, with a dash of dry theories and dry wit. Am I making you gag with all this chirpiness yet? :)

Best moments of the year so far: Fireworks so close you can almost smell the ash; bopping to a) New Order’s Regret, b) Things Can Only Get Better; beautiful bright new people who glow; the White Elephant party with L’Affaire and Panadol Menstrual and White Tigers and Conversations With God; talking of film adaptations and horror movies, religion and politicians and heart/head, action/contemplation, what I’ve forgotten about philosophy etc; long e-mails from my epistolary sweetheart.

And knowing some of these people will be “always” folk, people with whom we’ll see decades to come, we’ll be there for one another when we marry and have children and move on in our careers and go through seasons of life. We’ll travel together and laugh and share stories, celebrate one another’s successes, be there when we grieve. I love that, and I feel so privileged to have been a witness to how they’ve grown into the fine people they are today, and in return they’ve been witnesses to many of the things that made me who I am.

Time to relax a bit and get down from the champagne supernova high.