The game of queens, the immortal game
Saturday, November 28th, 2009READING Marilyn Yalom’s Birth Of The Chess Queen: A History now and it’s superb. A Spanish Hebrew text, attributed to Bonsenior ibn Yehia, possibly twelfth century, possible later:
She sits at the top of the high places above the city. She is restless and determined. She girds her loins with strength. Her feet stray not in her house. She moves in every direction and into every corner. Her evolutions are wonderful, her spirit untiring. How comely are her footsteps as she moves diagonally, one step after another, from square to square!
Yalom draws parallels between the rise of the chess queen and the ascent of female sovereigns in Europe.
I wonder if there are any good books about the history of chess in Asia. We don’t have the queen figure in Chinese chess — we have a river (楚河汉界) and a palace board, and cannons and elephants instead of bishops, and generals instead of kings. The general and his advisors cannot leave the palace squares. We play on the intersections instead of on squares.
And in China, weiqi (Go) was perceived as the popular game of the aristocracy, while xiangqi (Chinese chess) was the game of the masses.
I love how chess has provided matter for reflection on the most mystifying aspects of human existence — war, love, society, religion, even death. Omar Khayyam (died 1123): “We are in truth but pieces on this chess board of life, which in the end we leave, only to drop one by one into the grave of nothingness.” John Wales, Franciscan monk: “All the world’s a chess board.” Death being the great equaliser, a king could fall to the bottom of the sack and go to hell, while even a poor peasant might ascend to heaven.
Chess between courtly lovers: love as a combat between two worthy adversaries, and a ritual played according to rigorous, complex rules.
*
“The elevation of the chess queen and bishop to new levels of strength meant it took fewer moves, on average, to complete a match. Chess was now no longer suited to leisurely encounters between ladies and gentlemen that could last a day or more, with interruptions for eating, drinking, dancing and singing. Now chess was fast and fierece, with the game becoming less social and more competitive.”
*
Anthony Saidy’s The March Of Chess Ideas: Romantic, Scientific, Hypermodern, the New Dynamism. Developing and seeking open lines for pieces. How the amateur sees pieces and movement, the expert sees sixty-four squares with holes and lines and spheres of influence, and the genius apprehends a unified field within which space and force and mass are interacting valences: a Bishop tears the board in half and a Pawn bends the space around it the way mass can reshape space in the Einsteinian universe.
“Play the opening like a book, the middle game like a magician, and the endgame like a machine.”
- Rudolf Spielmann.
“I always loved complexity. With chess one creates beautiful problems.”
- Marcel Duchamp
The immortal game between Anderssen and Kieseritzsky in 1851, and its middle game: choosing whether to continue to escalate threats or start answering them, to the endgame, when the thrilling, maddening complexity of middlegame has been supplanted by a barren geometric landscape where one simple blunder can easily cost either player the game. The very best players know from experience, intuition, and calculation how a particular multiple-threat board arrangement is best acted on.
From the Romantics to Wilhelm Steinitz’s Scientific school, with a painstaking approach of trying to gain tiny advantages over time.
As metaphor, model and allegory, chess performs powerful cultural work. How Nabokov and Calvino write multi-leveled structured works, tricking the recipient with unexpected moves and elegant solutions of plot development. What really matters isn’t the catalogue of individual words as much as the system that binds them together. Rules, governed by logic, were the key to understanding and administering complex worlds. Logic and its consequences.
I love chess and the idea of chess: Memory, logic, calculation, creativity. And so much of “talent” is the ambition to succeed. Discipline, focus, patience and persistence. It’s a playing field for life, where one can develop sportsmanship, character and even grace. People who meet across a chessboard have an opportunity to interact on a very civilised level.
We live in an age where the truth is harder to come by because it is surrounded by facts, slick presentations and tools of distraction. One common response to our splintered, postmodern, slippery-truth age is not to think but to instead fall back on a fixed set of beliefs, a strict ideology. Chess helps our minds expand, grow comfortable with abstraction, learn to navigate complex systems. I love chess knowing that there are and always would be entire levels of play beyond my ability.
When I’m next in London I’ve to visit Simpson’s on the Strand, where the Immortal Game was played.
*
- Bobby Fischer’s Game of the Century against Donald Bryne, 1956.
- Paul Murphy vs Duke of Brunswick and Count Isouard, Paris 1858. “Opera game”.
- Wilhelm Steinitz’s Battle of Hastings vs Curt von Bardeleben, Hastings, England, 1895.
- Akiba Rubinstein’s “Polish Brilliancy” against Gersh Rotlewi, December 1907, Lodz, Poland.
- Kasparov vs Anatoli Karpov, Linares, Spain, 1993.
Many serious chess players talk about chess largely in artistic terms, comparing brilliant games to masterful paintings or great symphonies. But they do acknowledge one key difference. Unlike music or painting, chess requires of the viewer an initial period of instruction before revealing its aesthetic quality. A pity indeed for us chess novices. But we can study the history of play as well. Each era learns from past eras, and develops a new level of sophistication.
I’d be sure to teach any kids I have how to play chess step by step, going through these games and get them castling by the time they’re two :)
*
Under the Chinese silk comforter with my mug of tea, cubed mangoes, and Donne and Auden. It really doesn’t take much to make me contented — good books, tropical fruits, solitude when needed and blabbing on forever and a day here, sucking in knowledge in my usual dilettante manner — I could be an egghead gameshow/pub quizzing contestant.
I truly need time alone to recover from socialising. Am also physically recovering — spent some time in the pool getting lessons on the front crawl. It’s literally at a crawl, as I get tired kicking up and down and learning how to move my arms in the correct, graceful manner.