Jonathan Sacks’ powerful and insightful book. “We worship God not only in prayer, but also by how we act in the world…To know God is to act with justice and compassion, to recognise his image in other people, and to hear the silent cry of those in need.”
ISBN 0-8264-8622-3
God exists, therefore there is justice. But it is *divine* justice — justice from the perspective of one who knows all, sees all, and considers all: the universe as a whole, and time as a whole, which is to say, eternity. But we who live in space and time cannot see from this perspective, and if we did, it would not make us better human beings but worse.
To be a parent is to be moved by the cry of a child. But if the child is ill and needs medicine, we administer it, making ourselves temporarily deaf to its cry. A surgeon, to do his job competently and well, must to a certain extent desensitise himself to the patient’s fears and pains and regard him, however briefly, as a body rather than as a person. A statesman, to do his best for the country, must weigh long-term consequences and make tough, even brutal decisions: for soldiers to die in war if war is necessary; for people to be thrown out of jobs if economic stringency is needed. Parents, surgeons, and politicians have human feelings, but the very roles they occupy mean that at times they must override them if they are to do the best for whom they are responsible. To do the best for others needs a measure of detachment, a silencing of sympathy, an anaesthetising of compassion, for the road to happiness or health or peace sometimes runs through the landscape of pain and suffering and death.
If we were able to see how evil today leads to good tomorrow — if we were able to see from the point of view of God, creator of all — we would understand justice but *at the cost of ceasing to be human*. We would accept all, vindicate all, and become deaf to the cries of those in pain. God does not want us to cease to be human, for if he did, he would not have created us. We are not God. We will never see things from his perspective. The attempt to do so is an abdication of the human situation.
p. 22
What distinguishes the concept of tzedakah is, firstly, an absolute refusal on the part of the sages to romanticise poverty. It is not, for them, a blessed state. It is an unmitigated evil. “Poverty,” they said, “is a kind of death.” (p. 34)…There is nothing inevitable or divinely willed about social and economic inequality. Judaism rejects the almost universal belief in antiquity and throughout the Middle Ages that hierarchy and divisions of class are written into the structure of society. What human beings have created, human beings can rectify. (p. 36)
What matters is not how *much* you give, but *how* you do so. Anonymity in the giving of aid is essential to dignity. The poor must not be embarrassed. The rich must not be allowed to feel superior. We give, not to take pride in our generosity, still less to emphasise the dependency of others, but because we belong to a covenant of human solidarity, and because that is what God wants us to do, honouring the trust through which he has temporarily lent us wealth in the first place. (p. 38)…The rabbinic insistence that the community provide the poor with enough money so that they themselves can give is a profound insight into the human condition. So too is their understanding of wealth. As I noted in the first chapter, a series of research projects has shown that happiness is correlated not with what we possess, but with what we give. The privilege of wealth lies not in what it allows us to do for ourselves, but what it enables us to do for others. (p. 39)
*
What is hessed? It is usually translated as “kindness” but it also means “love” — not love as emotion or passion, but love expressed as deed. Theologians define *hessed* as *covenant love*. Covenant is the bond by which two parties pledge themselves to one another, each respecting the freedom and integrity of the other, agreeing to join their separate destinies into a single journey that they will travel together…Unlike a contract, it is an open-ended relationship lived towards an unknown future…(p. 45) It is love moralised into small gestures of help and understanding, support and friendship: the poetry of everyday life written into the language of simple deeds…Where *tzedakah* is a gift or loan of money, *hessed* is the gift of the person. It costs less and more: less because its gestures often cost little or nothing, more because it takes time and attention, existential generosity, the gift of self to self. More than anything else, *hessed* humanises the world. (p. 46)
Tzedakah (charity) is done with one’s money; while loving-kindness (hessed) may be done with one’s money or with one’s person. Charity is done only to the poor, while loving-kindness may be given both to the poor and to the rich. Charity is given only to the living, while loving-kindness may be shown to the living and the dead.
p. 50
Morality refers to the universal principles we use in dealings with humanity in general: our relationships with strangers. Ethics, by contrast, refers to our relationships with those with whom we share a special bond of shared memory and belonging: family, friends, fellow countrymen, or people with whom we share a faith.
…Justice demands disengagement (Adam Smith spoke of adopting the standpoint of an “impartial spectator”). Hessed is an act of engagement. Justice is best administered without emotion. Hessed exists only in virtue of emotion, empathy and sympathy, feeling-with and feeling-for. We act with kindness because we know what it feels like to be in need of kindness. We comfort the mourners because we know what it is to mourn. Hessed requires not detached rationality but emotional intelligence.
(p. 51)
*
I find this poem from the Writer’s Almanac today very lovely:
Letter To My Unborn Child
by Young Dawkins
Someday you will want to know
and I might not be here,
so
this is how you were made.
It was a soft night
near the back of June,
clear, for a change, no rain.
Old women were out
gathering healing herbs,
fennel, dog rose and rhu.
Bonfires burned on all seven hills,
drunken young men
leapt through the flames.
Down in the bogs
the foxfire glowed,
will o’ the wisps edged the meadows.
In our bed my wife laughed out loud
at the loving pleasure
of being a woman.
Like any man, I suppose,
I was proud,
and we fell to our sleep both smiling.
You were created
of passion and magic,
in Scotland, on Mid-Summer’s Eve.
Here in the North,
that augers you special,
your mother and I believe.
“Letter To My Unborn Child” by Young Dawkins, from The Lilac Thief. © Sargent Press, 2009.